🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam decision, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that could add up to five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 ruling, issued on Thursday, approves a request by the state to overturn a district court's injunction that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating much confusion and disturbing the fine equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its action.

The federal court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to revert to the districts created after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

With a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's decision. She contended that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its opinion was crafted by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its increased favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a breach of the constitution.

National Redistricting Battle

The ruling comes amid a nationwide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican control. Usually, boundary revision occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several more Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, in response, have pushed back with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas attorney general praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures representation favorable to the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic leaders lamented the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic leader argued the court had once again shredded its legitimacy by approving a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.